Hillary Clinton Faces 2 Smoking Guns -Democrats Hate Her But Probably Vote For Her

040560-hillary-clinton.gifThe federal criminal investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s failure to secure state secrets was ratcheted up earlier this week, and at the same time, the existence of a parallel criminal investigation of another aspect of her behavior was made known. This is the second publicly revealed expansion of the FBI’s investigations in two months.

I have argued for two months that Clinton’s legal woes are either grave or worse than grave. That argument has been based on the hard, now public evidence of her failure to safeguard national security secrets and the known manner in which the Department of Justice addresses these failures.

The failure to safeguard state secrets is an area of the law in which the federal government has been aggressive to the point of being merciless. State secrets are the product of members of the intelligence community’s risking their lives to obtain information.

Before she was entrusted with any state secrets — indeed, on her first full day as secretary of state — Clinton received instruction from FBI agents on how to safeguard them; and she signed an oath swearing to comply with the laws commanding the safekeeping of these secrets. She was warned that the failure to safeguard secrets — known as espionage — would most likely result in aggressive prosecution.

In the cases of others, those threats have been carried out. The Obama Department of Justice prosecuted a young sailor for espionage for sending a selfie to his girlfriend, because in the background of the photo was a view of a sonar screen on a submarine. It prosecuted a heroic Marine for espionage for warning his superiors of the presence of an al-Qaida operative in police garb inside an American encampment in Afghanistan, because he used a Gmail account to send the warning.

It also prosecuted Gen. David Petraeus for espionage for keeping secret and top-secret documents in an unlocked drawer in his desk inside his guarded home. It alleged that he shared those secrets with a friend who also had a security clearance, but it dropped those charges.

The obligation of those to whom state secrets have been entrusted to safeguard them is a rare area in which federal criminal prosecutions can be based on the defendant’s negligence. Stated differently, to prosecute Clinton for espionage, the government need not prove that she intended to expose the secrets.

The evidence of Clinton’s negligence is overwhelming. The FBI now has more than 1,300 protected emails that she received on her insecure server and sent to others — some to their insecure servers. These emails contained confidential, secret or top-secret information, the negligent exposure of which is a criminal act.

One of the top-secret emails she received and forwarded contained a photo taken from an American satellite of the North Korean nuclear facility that detonated a device just last week. Because Clinton failed to safeguard that email, she exposed to hackers and thus to the North Koreans the time, place and manner of American surveillance of them. This type of data is in the highest category of protected secrets.

Last weekend, the State Department released two smoking guns — each an email from Clinton to a State Department subordinate. One instructed a subordinate who was having difficulty getting a document to Clinton that she had not seen by using a secure State Department fax machine to use an insecure fax machine. The other instructed another subordinate to remove the “confidential” or “secret” designation from a document Clinton had not seen before sending it to her. These two emails show a pattern of behavior utterly heedless of the profound responsibilities of the secretary of state, repugnant to her sworn agreement to safeguard state secrets, and criminal at their essence.

Also this past weekend, my Fox News colleagues Katherine Herridge and Pamela Browne learned from government sources that the FBI is investigating whether Clinton made any decisions as secretary of state to benefit her family foundation or her husband’s speaking engagements. If so, this would be profound public corruption.

This investigation was probably provoked by several teams of independent researchers — some of whom are financial experts and have published their work — who have been investigating the Clinton Foundation for a few years. They have amassed a treasure-trove of documents demonstrating fraud and irregularities in fundraising and expenditures, and they have shown a pattern of favorable State Department treatment of foreign entities coinciding with donations by those entities to the Clinton Foundation and their engaging former President Bill Clinton to give speeches.

There are now more than 100 FBI agents investigating Hillary Clinton. Her denial that she is at the core of their work is political claptrap with no connection to reality. It is inconceivable that the FBI would send such vast resources in the present dangerous era on a wild-goose chase.

It is the consensus of many of us who monitor government behavior that the FBI will recommend indictment. That recommendation will go to Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who, given Clinton’s former status in the government and current status in the Democratic Party, will no doubt consult the White House.

If a federal grand jury were to indict Clinton for espionage or corruption, that would be fatal to her political career.

If the FBI recommends indictment and the attorney general declines to do so, expect Saturday Night Massacre-like leaks of draft indictments, whistleblower revelations and litigation, and FBI resignations, led by the fiercely independent and intellectually honest FBI Director James Comey himself.

That would be fatal to Clinton’s political career, as well.



Liberalism and democrats are mentally ill

The radical left’s efforts to regulate the people from cradle to grave. To rescue us from our troubled lives, the liberal agenda recommends denial of personal responsibility, encourages self-pity and other-pity, fosters government dependency, promotes sexual indulgence, rationalizes violence, excuses financial obligation, justifies theft, ignores rudeness, prescribes complaining and blaming, denigrates marriage and the family, legalizes all abortion, defies religious and social tradition, declares inequality unjust, and rebels against the duties of citizenship. Through multiple entitlements to unearned goods, services and social status, the liberal politician promises to ensure everyone’s material welfare, provide for everyone’s healthcare, protect everyone’s self-esteem, correct everyone’s social and political disadvantage, educate every citizen, and eliminate all class distinctions. Radical liberalism thus assaults the foundations of civilized freedom. Given its irrational goals, coercive methods and historical failures, and given its perverse effects on character development, there can be no question of the radical agenda’s madness. Only an irrational agenda would advocate a systematic destruction of the foundations on which ordered liberty depends. Only an irrational man would want the state to run his life for him rather than create secure conditions in which he can run his own life. Only an irrational agenda would deliberately undermine the citizen’s growth to competence by having the state adopt him. Only irrational thinking would trade individual liberty for government coercion, sacrificing the pride of self-reliance for welfare dependency. Only a madman would look at a community of free people cooperating by choice and see a society of victims exploited by villains. [From The Liberal Mind; The Psychological Causes of Political Madness by Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr., MD]

Does Not Matter To This President What The Truth Is – He Want’s To Ban All Guns

When you or your family is in danger to lose life or limb, there is one governing principle, one law that surpasses all laws that man can legislate. Mankind allways has the right to protect himself or herself from the evil that has plagued the world since the dawn of time, since the fall of man himself. What is it?

Reason or Force – That’s It.

Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another: reason and force.
If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception.

Reason or force, that’s it.

In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.

When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force.

The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gang banger, and a single guy on equal footing with a carload of drunken guys with baseball bats.

The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender.

There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the source of bad force equations. These are the people who think that we’d be more civilized if all guns were removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier for a [armed] mugger to do his job. That, of course, is only true if the mugger’s potential victims are mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat–it has no validity when most of a mugger’s potential marks are armed.

People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that’s the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.

Then there’s the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser.

People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don’t constitute lethal force, watch too much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst. The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker. If both are armed, the field is level.

The gun is the only weapon that’s as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weight lifter. It simply wouldn’t work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn’t both lethal and easily employable.

When I carry a gun, I don’t do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I’m looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don’t carry it because I’m afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn’t limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. It removes force from the equation… and that’s why carrying a gun is a civilized act.

So, the greatest civilization is one where all citizens are equally armed and can only be persuaded, never forced.

“The Gun Is Civilization” – By Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret.)

House Resolution 569 – Condemning violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States.

Here’s a list of those worthless piles of dog shit who agree with the Jihadists that are running wild around the world and have set up shop in our country. Should it not read this way? Condemning violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards ANY RELIGION in the United States? They have no problem with Christians being exterminated systematically around the world. Christians being burned alive, Children being raped tortured burned in oil. These galactic stupid morons live in a fantasy world. Every time these idiots say something the problem gets worse. And of course you got that Rep. McCollum, Betty [D-MN-4] right in the middle with her nose up Obama’s ass. I bet you by the end of this year there will be another 9/11 and it’s in part because of these people.

Just wait you retards! You will sing another tune when it comes to you or your family, until then stand up for ALL AMERICANS! Vote these losers out of office.

Cosponsor Date Cosponsored
Rep. Honda, Michael M. [D-CA-17]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Ellison, Keith [D-MN-5]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Crowley, Joseph [D-NY-14]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Carson, Andre [D-IN-7]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]* 12/17/2015
Rep. McCollum, Betty [D-MN-4]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Maloney, Carolyn B. [D-NY-12]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Kildee, Daniel T. [D-MI-5]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Sanchez, Loretta [D-CA-46]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Rangel, Charles B. [D-NY-13]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Peters, Scott H. [D-CA-52]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Ashford, Brad [D-NE-2]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Grayson, Alan [D-FL-9]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Takai, Mark [D-HI-1]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Higgins, Brian [D-NY-26]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Keating, William R. [D-MA-9]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Grijalva, Raul M. [D-AZ-3]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-23]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Butterfield, G. K. [D-NC-1]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Gallego, Ruben [D-AZ-7]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Bustos, Cheri [D-IL-17]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Delaney, John K. [D-MD-6]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Gutierrez, Luis V. [D-IL-4]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Quigley, Mike [D-IL-5]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Esty, Elizabeth H. [D-CT-5]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Kennedy, Joseph P., III [D-MA-4]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Kelly, Robin L. [D-IL-2]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Johnson, Eddie Bernice [D-TX-30]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Meng, Grace [D-NY-6]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Green, Al [D-TX-9]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Clark, Katherine M. [D-MA-5]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA-28]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Hastings, Alcee L. [D-FL-20]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Farr, Sam [D-CA-20]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Pallone, Frank, Jr. [D-NJ-6]* 12/17/2015
Rep. McDermott, Jim [D-WA-7]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-13]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Edwards, Donna F. [D-MD-4]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Brady, Robert A. [D-PA-1]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Wilson, Frederica S. [D-FL-24]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Doyle, Michael F. [D-PA-14]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Sires, Albio [D-NJ-8]* 12/17/2015
Rep. DelBene, Suzan K. [D-WA-1]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-27]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Polis, Jared [D-CO-2]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Loebsack, David [D-IA-2]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Pascrell, Bill, Jr. [D-NJ-9]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-12]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Hinojosa, Ruben [D-TX-15]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Yarmuth, John A. [D-KY-3]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Tsongas, Niki [D-MA-3]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Langevin, James R. [D-RI-2]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-13]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-41]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Ryan, Tim [D-OH-13]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Serrano, Jose E. [D-NY-15]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Johnson, Henry C. “Hank,” Jr. [D-GA-4]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Tonko, Paul [D-NY-20]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Lofgren, Zoe [D-CA-19]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD-8]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Capps, Lois [D-CA-24]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Price, David E. [D-NC-4]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Matsui, Doris O. [D-CA-6]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Heck, Denny [D-WA-10]* 12/17/2015
Rep. Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX-18] 12/18/2015
Rep. Carney, John C., Jr. [D-DE-At Large] 12/18/2015
Rep. Becerra, Xavier [D-CA-34] 12/18/2015
Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-CA-15] 12/18/2015
Rep. Larson, John B. [D-CT-1] 12/18/2015
Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1] 12/18/2015
Rep. Welch, Peter [D-VT-At Large] 12/18/2015
Rep. Doggett, Lloyd [D-TX-35] 12/18/2015
Rep. Himes, James A. [D-CT-4] 12/18/2015
Rep. Cartwright, Matt [D-PA-17] 12/18/2015
Rep. Ruiz, Raul [D-CA-36] 01/05/2016
Rep. Israel, Steve [D-NY-3] 01/05/2016
Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2] 01/05/2016
Rep. Lujan Grisham, Michelle [D-NM-1] 01/05/2016
Rep. Moulton, Seth [D-MA-6] 01/05/2016
Rep. Smith, Adam [D-WA-9] 01/05/2016
Rep. Lowenthal, Alan S. [D-CA-47] 01/05/2016
Rep. Murphy, Patrick [D-FL-18] 01/05/2016
Rep. Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [D-NY-25] 01/05/2016
Rep. Huffman, Jared [D-CA-2] 01/05/2016
Rep. Kuster, Ann M. [D-NH-2] 01/06/2016
Rep. Eshoo, Anna G. [D-CA-18] 01/06/2016
Rep. Larsen, Rick [D-WA-2] 01/06/2016
Rep. Lawrence, Brenda L. [D-MI-14] 01/06/2016
Rep. Scott, Robert C. “Bobby” [D-VA-3] 01/06/2016
Rep. Jeffries, Hakeem S. [D-NY-8] 01/06/2016
Rep. Lieu, Ted [D-CA-33] 01/06/2016
Rep. Fattah, Chaka [D-PA-2] 01/07/2016
Rep. Roybal-Allard, Lucille [D-CA-40] 01/08/2016
Rep. Thompson, Bennie G. [D-MS-2] 01/08/2016
Rep. Lujan, Ben Ray [D-NM-3] 01/08/2016
Rep. Nadler, Jerrold [D-NY-10] 01/08/2016
Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1] 01/08/2016

Judge Jeanine to Philly Mayor: ‘Stop Mouthing Off When You Don’t Know the Facts’

In her opening statement on Justice, Judge Jeanine Pirro slammed the mayor of Philadelphia for bringing “nonsense apologetic politically incorrect baloney” to a law enforcement press conference after the shooting of a police officer by an alleged Islamic extremist.

Mayor Jim Kenney emphasized Friday that the shooting of Officer Jesse Hartnett the previous night had nothing to do with the teachings of Islam.

Pirro called it “one of the most astounding asinine statements that I’ve heard since the last time I listened to a White House press conference.”

“How dare you take the sympathy away from the victim — Officer Hartnett — and the men and women in blue under siege every day by the haters and turn it into sympathy and understanding for a different group?” she said.

“I don’t need you to tell me or lecture me what I should be thinking because you want to suck up to the commander-in-chief. So how about you drop your liberal ideological nonsense and stop apologizing and start focusing on the threats to kill those in your department?”


Obama 250 Rounds of Golf since 2009

Obama say he “WILL NOT REST” …..

The ObamaGolfCounter.com

How many millions does it cost for president Obama to hack a round of golf ? Well, Air Force One cost just under $300,000.00 per hour to operate alone, and then add up moving armored vehicles, other airplanes, secret service and on and on.

Seems to me it could be close to a million dollars per round of golf. So…  is he reaching about a quarter of a BILLION dollars for golf alone? No one know for sure because it’s like top secret.

See any problems with getting things done at the White House? See a morality problem? The mains stream media would be all over any Republican president during the longest recession in US history.

How many children could have been save from cancer with that money? People say on both sides he has a right to some free time. Of course but when does it cross over into Alice !n Wonderland kind of free time.

Defining Political Child Abuse: A Tale of Two Cruz Families

This article is worthy of repeating. This was written by Michelle Malkin Journalist and author.
Cruz Girl

Remember 5-year-old Sophie Cruz?

Groomed for a year by an outfit called the “Full Rights for Immigrants Coalition,” Sophie is the ponytailed poster child for amnesty who was literally propped up in front of the pope during a September visit to Washington, D.C.

Latino activists brazenly bragged about training the first-grader before the visit and crafting a letter in her name pleading with the Catholic pontiff to help her rescue President Obama’s executive illegal immigrant amnesty program DAPA (Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents), which was halted under federal court order on May.

In The Washington Post, a Harvard University professor praised the kiddie human shield tactics of the amnesty movement after Sophie’s stunt.

“Tactically really, it’s one of those moves that is just brilliant,” Roberto Gonzales, a Harvard University sociologist, told the Post reporter, Janell Ross. Ross marveled at the “power of personal narrative” and noted how the use of a child to deliver a political message had been “deployed to great effect.”

Sophie Cruz’s family now works with FWD.us, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s multi-million-dollar lobbying group, which just two weeks ago featured the girl in a high-profile ad campaign reading a fear-mongering script on “how her family would be ripped apart” if America got serious about deporting illegal border-crossers, visa overstayers, document fraudsters and criminal alien fugitives.

The Washington Post again provided positive coverage of little Sophie Cruz’s latest foray in politics. The article attacked Republicans who support strict immigration enforcement and included a massive photo of the cute child, supplied by her father, coloring a “pro-immigration” propaganda picture for amnesty.

Now, imagine.

Imagine if a conservative political cartoonist had depicted Sophie as an organ grinder monkey on a leash held by her illegal immigrant parents and Mark Zuckerberg.

Imagine if a conservative political cartoonist had defended the depiction of Sophie as a chained dancing monkey by commenting that her parents’ use of their daughter in political ads and media students made the child “fair game.”

Imagine the front-page, white-hot, and nonstop outrage from Democrats, journalists and the White House that would ensue.

Somehow, The Washington Post’s coverage of 5-year-old Sophie Cruz’s manipulation and exploitation by corporate special interests and amnesty theater production managers escaped the attention of Pulitzer Prize-winning Washington Post editorial cartoonist Ann Telnaes.

Instead, Telnaes focused her supposed wrath over political child abuse last week on another Cruz family: GOP presidential candidate and U.S.

Senator Ted Cruz.

Cruz’s sin? Including his 4-year-old and 7-year-old daughters, Catherine and Caroline, in a light-hearted Christmas video poking fun at his rivals and playing off his “Green Eggs and Ham” moment on the Senate floor in 2013.

In the bizarre world of The Washington Post, employing a 5-year-old to breach Secret Service security for an international headline-grabbing papal photo op and to shill for Facebook’s self-serving immigration expansionist agenda is “brilliant” and humanizing.

But taping a viral parody Web ad with your kids telling Seussian Hillary Clinton email server jokes is practically an international human rights crime.

Telnaes indulged her Cruz Derangement Syndrome not just by attacking Cruz, but by serving up a crude depiction of his young, half-Hispanic daughters as animated monkeys. She bitterly warned on Twitter that since “Ted Cruz has put his children in a political ad — don’t start screaming when editorial cartoonists draw them as well.”

Disingenuous jerkette.

Politicians in both parties put their children in political ads and policy debates all the time. Over the years, the Obamas’ daughters have made strategic campaign cameos for their parents during both of their dad’s presidential election drives, the Obamacare debate, and their mom’s East Wing anti-obesity initiative.

The Clintons did the same with their daughter. Now, at every available campaign Kodak moment, those geriatric masters of Democratic political stagecraft are currently welded to their baby granddaughter like toddlers tethered to a binkie dipped in Pixy Stix.

Imagine the storm of protest that would have rained down on any prominent conservative political cartoonist who caricatured Sasha, Malia, Chelsea or Charlotte as circus animals performing for their parents for maximum electoral gain.

Democrats surround themselves daily with human Snuggie blankets of other people’s babies, toddlers, tweens and teens to push gun control, endless expansions of government health care programs and entitlements, and abdication of our borders and immigration laws. But instead of decrying this blatant political child abuse, “progressives” attack the critics of these debate-stifling tactics for … hating on children!

When the media’s selective civility police argue that children should be “off-limits” in politics, what they really mean is that prop-a-palooza should only be allowed when the children promote politically correct causes and left-wing politicians.

The Washington Post deleted the cartoon that maliciously turned two innocent daughters of a Republican candidate into dancing monkeys — but not before revealing itself to be run and staffed by drooling moral infants in soiled, double-standards diapers.

Michelle Malkin is author of the new book “Who Built That: Awe-Inspiring Stories of American Tinkerpreneurs.”


Muslim Mob Does the UNTHINKABLE to Woman Accused of Burning Quran

What may be the most disturbing video to come out of Afghanistan in some time — and that’s saying something — a Muslim mob brutally attacked Farkhunda Malikzada, a 27-year-old student of Islam accused of burning a Quran. – Video provided by Conservative Tribune

After more than a decade of American interaction in Afghanistan the Muslims are just as brutal and savage as any humans on earth. These animals should be wiped off the face of the Earth, worse than any Nazi or barbarian that ever lived.


2016 is the tipping point for America do you want freedom or socialism and tyranny?

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.” -Marcus Cicero



MSN is the Muslim Student Association- Part of the Muslim Brotherhood. Here is how monsters are created on college campuses. The infiltration of Islamic Radicals.

The spread of Islamic Radical Jihad is spreading around the world like a cancer that has metastasized all over the body. This most recent attack is just the beginning because the truth is being suppressed by the left and the media is not asking the questions or reporting on it. which a deadly combination. There are a growing number of people in all areas are sounding the alarm but know one is listening.

The 8 years of Obama is creating another set up for another 9/11 type attack, just like the failures of Bill Clinton in the 90’s.

The terrorist are here, they are there and they are working around our Signal Corps and as the Mayor of Jerusalem just eloquently stated 2 days ago in a Fox interview stated:

“What’s more important is human intelligence, I think America is not very good at that”

Now that’s a pretty profound and wise statement. There is no human intelligence in our national security since Obama and his administration including the DOJ, FBI, DOD have been sabotaged by the political delusional narrative created by this president. This is what will get us all killed. Who’s protecting our national security? Who’s protecting the presidents legacy? It’s obvious. It’s his appointees!

There is not a political solution foe this ideological terror playing out. Have you ever seen moderate Muslims at any time in the last 20 years demonstrate in the streets carrying the American flag and chanting “God bless America”? Hmm…

Is that concept really that hard to understand that the silence can be considered an affirmation of the Radical side of Islam?  NO! Americans see this and have been literally painfully aware of this. This is why there is a Donald Trump.

There will be no relief of this gathering storm until Obama is out of office and replaced with someone like Ted Cruz or some other conservative.